Legislature(2009 - 2010)
2010-04-14 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2010-04-14 House Journal Page 2284 HB 324 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the April 13, 2010, calendar (page 2244), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 324(FIN) "An Act relating to the crime of failure to appear; relating to arrest for violating certain conditions of release; relating to release before trial, before sentence, and pending appeal; relating to material witnesses; relating to temporary release; relating to release on a petition to revoke probation; relating to the first appearance before a judicial officer after arrest; relating to service of process for domestic violence protective orders; making conforming amendments; amending Rules 5 and 41, Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure, and Rules 206 and 603, Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure; and providing for an effective date." The question being: "Shall CSHB 324(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 324(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 40 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 2010-04-14 House Journal Page 2285 Yeas: Austerman, Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, N.Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kelly, Kerttula, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Petersen, Ramras, Salmon, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson And so, CSHB 324(FIN) passed the House. Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule changes. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Johansen moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Ramras gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 324(FIN) and later withdrew it. HB 324 Representative Ramras moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of CSHB 324(FIN) be taken up on the same day. Representative Kerttula objected. The question being: "Shall reconsideration of CSHB 324(FIN) be taken up on the same day?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 324(FIN) Third Reading Take up Reconsideration on the Same Day Reconsideration YEAS: 25 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 2010-04-14 House Journal Page 2286 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Dahlstrom, Edgmon, Fairclough, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Herron, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Keller, Kelly, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Nays: Buch, Cissna, Crawford, Doogan, N.Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Holmes, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Petersen, Salmon, Tuck And so, lacking the required 27 votes, the motion failed, and reconsideration of CSHB 324(FIN) will be available on April 15, 2010.